Attending judging sessions for Pictures of the Year International (POYi) never seemed to work out well with my school and work schedule. Luckily, I was able to catch the final judging of the “Long Form Multimedia Story” category by watching and listening to the live feed while at my job. The judges for this session were Andrew DeVigal from The New York Times, Duy Linh Tu from Columbia University, and documentary filmmakers Nelson Walker, and Lynn True.
This category had over 50 long form, 10 to 30 minute, pieces to narrow down for awards. The judges brought up a lot of great points regarding the remaining four documentaries, each guaranteed at least an Award of Excellence. They discussed the differences between the variety of stories and styles, and the challenges that a longer form of storytelling holds to a documentary photographer.
One of Lynn True’s favorites is “Half-Lives” by Maisie Crow, Jesse Dukes, Ted Genoways, and Adam Brock. She liked that it “brought to light so many things that [she] wasn’t aware of today in 2012 with the Chernobyl accident.” True said she was surprised in a way and that it was beautifully put together. For her, it “really hit all the marks in bringing an issue to light.” If True were to pick one to not put in the top three, she would go with “Machine Man” by Alfonso Moral and Roser Corella due to it being “a hair below the others in following the criteria for this subject.” Coincidentally, True was the one that earlier moved “Machine Man” forward.
Duy Linh Tu was impressed overall with the final pieces that they are deciding between because of how they show a promising future to the industry of documentarians. Tu went with the opposite approach as True. He acknowledged that there was great editing and transition in “Half-Lives,” but for him the longer piece (about 15 minutes) was crucial. “When I commit to a story of that length I am searching for traditional narrative structure. Overall there is adversity in the topic, but none of these characters went through the whole arch of the story,” Tu said. He liked that “Machine Man” is long, but shorter. Tu especially liked that the videographer utilized the camera to take advantage of creating a different type of feel to the story.
Nelson Walker loved “A Chance In Hell” by Brian J. Clark and Ross Taylor due to the imagery and emotional impact. Walker did comment though that in terms of technical, in comparison to the others, it is not the same level of expertise in the way the whole package is. Walker also noted that “A Darkness Visible” by Mediastorm had some strong stylistic choices.
Andrew DeVigal stated, “Choosing a first comes with great responsibility. There tends to be a follow-up in the industry with where we should go and focus research.” DeVigal looked at his choice in answering what stories he wants to see more of in the coming years. He chose “A Darkness Visible” to be one that he sees at the top. “To me it was a powerful way to put a narrative in a different kind of light,” DeVigal said. He felt like “Half-Lives” didn’t do as much for him because parts of it went astray. He would also like to see “Machine Man” up on second place because it is beautiful and parts of the narrative just surprise him.
After much debate, “A Darkness Visible” was given the Award of Excellence. Third Place was awarded to “Half-Lives,” Second Place was awarded to “A Chance In Hell,” and First Place to “Machine Man.”
In my opinion, I do agree with what these four pieces were awarded. I watched all of them later and I couldn’t help but be really struck by “Machine Man.” As Tu pointed out, the videographer really utilized camera angles and lenses to make this a creative, talented, and incredible piece despite its close to 15-minute length. I do think that it is important to follow the traditional narrative arch in these long form documentaries because it helps keep the viewer interested in sticking with the piece.
I wanted to write out each of the judge’s opinions when trying to decide on awards because I found their commentary interesting and worthwhile. I could give my reaction to each of these pieces, but I don’t think it would amount to as much as what they each had to say. Overall, I recommend viewing all four because they are all great in their own way.












